
OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY
COLLEGE’S
GUIDEBOOK FOR
THE DATATEL PROJECT

September 2000
Table of Contents
History of and Participation in the
Procurement Process
College Priorities FY 1998 - FY 2002
Economic Development Focus FY 2001
Human Resource Development Focus FY
2001
Datatel Project Mission and Goals
Teams, Responsibilities and Roles
Application and Module Teams and Responsibilities
Purpose
|
Oklahoma City
Community College is implementing a new student/administrative information
system. Colleague is the name of the new system recently purchased from
Datatel, Inc. It is expected that it
will take about two years to make Colleague
fully operational. Implementation of Colleague
is an evolutionary process. As we gain
expertise and confidence in the system, we will continually strive to
incorporate more functionality and sophistication in the use of the software.
This plan provides
an overview of the Colleague
implementation project: its mission,
goals, scope, approach, supporting organizational structure, administrative
procedures, and timetable.
Implementation activities are quickly unfolding and will involve most,
if not all, employees at some point in the implementation process. This plan provides a context for these activities.
Implementing the Colleague system will be a challenging
and exciting undertaking. It will
require a new order of cooperation, effort, and organization of work. The payoffs for successfully completing this
task are great. When completed, Colleague will provide us the capacity
to work more efficiently and effectively and to incorporate current information
technology that will take us into the 21st Century. Most importantly, Colleague will enable us to significantly improve both
quantitatively and qualitatively the support and services we provide our
students, employees, and community.
Background
|
The administrative
systems that the College currently uses for its core business applications were
developed in the early 1970s (Finance system), mid 1970s (Student system), and
early 1980s (Human Resources system).
At the time, state of the art tools for mainframe-based application
development were utilized. Although all
of these systems have undergone extensive enhancement and modification since
initial development the current system is unable to provide the support and
services necessary for students, employees, and the community. The need for a new financial system is most
critical, as the current one no longer provides some of the key budgetary
functions central to the College’s operations.
The current system does not provide integration between various
functional areas. The interactions
between various functional areas are sub-standard and others have yet to be
integrated because of the system’s limitations.
Much of the
groundwork, which must precede the purchase of a new system, was completed
during the 1999-2000 academic year e.g., review by constituent groups, establishing
standards for the infrastructure, development of the bidding process and its
evaluation protocols. Oklahoma City
Community College moved to purchase a new system during the spring of 2000.
The following
schedule outlines the events leading to approval of the Colleague purchase:
June of 1999 Request
for Proposal reviewed and finalized
April of 2000 Vendor
proposals evaluated (Datatel and SCT selected as finalists)
Project Team
members participating in the evaluation process:
Dr. Barbara Vrana,
Chief Information Officer
Ms. Sherry
Hendrix, Information Technology Project Manager
Ms. Ruth Boone,
Director of Human Resources
Ms. Gloria
Cardenas-Barton, Dean of Admissions/Registrar
Ms. Mary Williams,
Dean of Information Technology
Mr. John
Richardson, Director of Computer Systems Development
Ms. Donna Nance,
Director of Finance
April of 2000 Oklahoma
City Community College’s Board of Regents approved the recommendation of
Datatel, Inc.
Oklahoma City Community College Mission, Educational Philosophy,
Vision, College Priorities and Areas of Focus
|
Oklahoma City Community College serves the
people of central Oklahoma by providing educational opportunities, including
certificates and associate degrees, business training, and continuing education
programs. The College prepares
community members to participate in an increasingly global society. With an
emphasis on student success, the College is committed to making a significant and
positive difference in the lives of individuals and in the community as a
whole.
As Oklahoma City’s community college, we
promote student success through: open access
to the College; quality in the
learning environment; excellence in
the faculty and staff; competency-based learning; comprehensive and innovative programs
and services; cooperation in the
development and improvement of programs and services; and holding students,
employees, and programs accountable for
high performance standards.
Oklahoma City Community College is known:
·
For the success
of its students. Student Success is achieved through strong educational programs and
services in which students are provided opportunities and support in
identifying and meeting their educational objectives.
·
As a leader in
implementing and using technology. Technology is innovatively incorporated
into the curriculum, instructional delivery systems, and daily operations.
·
As a major
resource for community and economic development. The College has positioned itself to be recognized as the community’s greatest resource for human
and economic development.
·
As an important
partner with public and private entities.
Cooperation is seen as a way
to enhance the resources available to students and faculty. Working in partnership with public and
private organizations, the College provides quality education and services to
an ever-growing and diverse student population.
·
As a leader and
model for other colleges in achieving exceptional enrollment, retention, and graduation rates.
The College
is an integral part of the future of this community providing extraordinary
educational and cultural opportunities to central Oklahoma. The College will be:
·
The recognized
leader in central Oklahoma for health technologies and pre-health professional
programs.
·
The
premier center in central Oklahoma for developing skills in using high-tech
communications systems and accessing worldwide information.
·
Known for its
quality educational programs that prepare and challenge Oklahomans to
participate in an increasingly global society.
·
The primary
educational partner in economic development, brokering educational and training
services throughout central Oklahoma.
Oklahoma City Community College will continue to
become the educational leader in health technologies and pre-health programs
by: continuing to enhance current programs; developing and implementing new
programs; and developing recruitment and marketing activities for special
target populations.
Oklahoma City Community College will focus
technology efforts in: the implementation of a new integrated information
system; the use of technology for teaching and learning; and to provide
programs that prepare the workforce for careers in technology.
Oklahoma City Community College will continue to enhance its activities
by:
increasing infusion of global focus into existing courses and programs
to assist students in developing the broadened knowledge of and the skills
necessary to succeed in a global society; establishing an International Studies
program offering certificates and degrees; and establishing a World Language &
Culture Center.
Oklahoma City Community College, through a
centralized point-of-contact, will continue to expand it’s role as a broker of
education and training, by providing programs, services, and activities that
are responsive to current and future workforce needs.
Oklahoma City Community College will enhance
programs and services designed to improve the enrollment, retention and
graduation rates of students.
Oklahoma City Community College will implement development plans for
all College employees with an emphasis on technology training, faculty and
staff development, and leadership and management development. The College will also continue efforts to
maintain a wage and salary plan that emphasizes recognition of performance and
competitive salaries and benefits.
Oklahoma City Community
College’s image within the community as a resource for educational and training
opportunities will be strengthened through programs and activities that target specific markets and
enhance enrollment growth.
Datatel Project
Mission and Goals
|
The mission of the
Datatel project is to move the College to a highly integrated and effective information
system that supports education, provides accuracy and ease of use, and is
consistent with the College’s vision, priorities and FY 2001 areas of focus.
The project
implementation goals are to:
We will succeed
when we have converted from our current “legacy” software to the Datatel Colleague software. This will be demonstrated when:
We will achieve
these outcomes through:
To provide
information technology that supports all administrative units with appropriate
databases, information and analytic functions.
The Colleague implementation
project is the orderly and timely conversion of Oklahoma City Community
College’s entire administrative information system. To the extent possible and as appropriate, processes currently
performed manually will be automated and integrated into Colleague, as will adjunct databases that are needed to conduct
college business e.g., facilities, demographic, and research files. The Project Team and its various work teams
will use this implementation plan and related reference materials provided by
Datatel to guide the College through the implementation process.
Implementation
Approach
|
The Colleague application will allow
Oklahoma City Community College to leverage an already cutting edge
infrastructure, using our networks to their best advantage by supporting a
fully integrated enterprise application.
A thoughtful, well-planned implementation will transform our institutional
culture to function effectively in a user-centric environment. The advantages
of implementing this system include a newly empowered user community,
state-of-the-art web capabilities, more flexible reporting, increased
productivity, and access to online, real time data.
No one should underestimate the scope,
range, and scale involved in implementing this system. Every College employee
will be involved, some extensively. Normal business operations must continue
while staff attends substantial training and planning sessions. Our legacy
system will remain operational during implementation, which will cause a
significant increase in the workload of the employees who use these systems,
and the software and hardware technicians who maintain it.
Training will be critical as we
implement new software, hardware, processes and systems, and all College
personnel should realize that this training is required.
Perhaps even more importantly, the
College will shift its paradigm in each workgroup as it re-examines how work
will be done, when it will be done, where it will be done, and who will do it.
There will be process improvement teams forming to conduct an analysis and
re-design of business processes.
It may appear that this new system is
about new technologies. Technology is the tool of change, however the people of
Oklahoma City Community College and their processes will be the focal point of
this implementation. Because of the scope of the changes ahead, Executive
Council will take an active leadership role during implementation. This
commitment includes making implementation and all of its aspects a priority.
There will be a moratorium on
enhancements and modifications to the existing legacy system.
The Datatel software
implementation is divided into four major project phases with the preparation
phase being a one-time initial phase:
The phased approach
is a way of structuring the work and associating a time frame to the tasks that
are critical to the College. Each
module or related modules for a department will go through each phase. For example, the Financial System could be
in the implementation of Phase III, the Human Resource System could be in Phase
II and the Student Information System could be in Phase I all overlaying each
other.
From module training
until the live date, approximately 40 percent of the time is planned for phase
I, 40 percent for phase II, and 20 percent for phase III. Phase IV, customization will not go into
effect until all systems have been live for one year or unless special
circumstances exist and exceptions have been approved by the Project Team.
Whereas phases I,
II, III, and IV happen for each module implemented, the preparation phase takes
place before implementing the software.
It constitutes planning and site preparation.
Phase I:
This step is the planning, analysis, and learning phase. As a general rule, it includes tasks
performed in the Education account.
Phase II:
This is the decision-making phase.
Up to this point the site has been learning the software and making
preliminary decision. During this
phase, they will formalize these decisions.
Tasks are performed in the Test account.
Phase III:
This last development is the “going live” phase. At this point, final decisions and programs
made in the prior test environment become integrated into and drive on-going operations.
Phase IV: As
users gain experience and knowledge of the Colleague system, they will
come to have many suggestions for customizing the system to achieve new levels
of efficiency and student/employee support.
In Phase IV, customization will take place as resources, schedules, priorities
permit and after all systems have been live for one year. EXCEPTIONS TO CUSTOMIZATION WILL ONLY BE
PERMITTED BY SPECIAL REQUEST IN WRITING TO THE PROJECT TEAM.
Each phase regards
the structuring of the work required to implement a particular software system
(finance) or module (accounts payable) and the referencing of critical tasks to
project time lines. Every attempt to
implement some aspect of the Colleague system will eventually involve
each of the four phases.
It is expected that these implementation efforts will yield more efficient, streamlined processes, which change the task and responsibilities of employees involved in the old and new processes. Employee roles and responsibilities may be changed and enhanced throughout the project but will occur most intensely during the earlier planning phases. Colleague will enable us to more efficiently and effectively serve students, employees, and the community.
The Project Team has
established a timetable for starting and completing implementation of the Colleague systems:
|
Date |
Action |
|
August 2000 |
Sign Contract |
|
August 2000 |
Implementation
Planning Meeting on Campus |
|
September 2000 |
Install Software |
|
September 2000 |
Complete OKCCC’s
Datatel Project Guidebook |
|
September 2000 |
College-Wide Kickoff |
|
October 2000 |
Begin Technical
Training |
|
July 2001 |
“Go Live” with the
Finance System* |
|
January 2002 |
“Go Live” with the
Human Resources System* |
|
July 2002 |
“Go Live” with the
Student Information System* |
*Each
system is comprised of several modules, which will have their own individual
“Go Live” dates prior to the “Go Live” date for the overall system.
Factors
weighted in the scheduling process include:
·
Customer
service considerations
·
Fiscal
and calendar year constraints
·
System
integration considerations
·
State
and federal reporting requirements
·
Datatel
recommendations
·
Hardware
and software installation requirements
·
Training
needs
·
Departmental
work loads
As
indicated in Figure 1, the Datatel/Colleague
Implementation Project organization consists of the Project Team and four Application Teams addressing different
functional areas, with each Application Team having a set of work groups or
Module Teams to attend to specific responsibilities or unit needs.
As
required, ad hoc cross-functional task groups will be formed to complete
specific sub-projects.
Figure
1 provides an overview of how the project will be structured and the team
leaders who will help implement their respective system applications. Addendums A and B list the names of
employees who will constitute the various implementation teams.
Team Structure

*Team
Leader
Project Team and
Responsibilities
The
Project Team is the team guiding the Colleague
implementation project. This team will
make final decisions, break logjams, and help coordinate project plans and
schedules. In the event that
differences arise and attempts to find a common ground are not reached, the
Project Team resolves to take the matter to Executive Council. The College on-campus Project Manager will
chair the Project Team:
Project
Leader Gary Lombard, Vice
President for Special Projects
Project
Manager Sherry Hendrix,
Information Technology Project Manager
Team Leaders Ms. Ruth Boone, Director of Human
Resources
Ms. Gloria
Cardenas-Barton, Dean of Admissions/Registrar
Ms. Donna Nance,
Director of Finance
Mr. John Richardson, Director of Computer Systems
Development
Other
Members Ms. Mary Williams, Dean
of Information Technology
Dr. John Barker, Director of Research
Mr. Bob Jenkins, Consultant to the Board of Regents
Dr. Keith Pratt, Datatel Project Manager
Overall
responsibilities of the Project Team is to:
·
Provide
Application and Module Teams with project direction and structure
·
Identify
and provide guidelines needed by teams to fulfill their missions
·
Promote
project achievement and results
·
Monitor
project pace toward milestones
·
Critically
assess accomplishments and anticipate coming needs
·
Adjust
composition of teams
·
Communicate
policy
·
Communicate
implementation project progress
·
Schedule
and enjoy success celebrations
·
Determine
core shared codes
The
Application and Module Teams are responsible for interfacing and converting
their area of responsibility to the new system. Among other things, their responsibilities are to:
·
Make
shared decisions within their application area
·
Identify
module level team tasks
·
Support
cross module learning within and between offices
·
Document
calendar events critical to implementation
·
Build
a departmental procedure manual
·
Recommend
interdepartmental reporting needs
·
Build
and test conversion plan
·
Provide
scheduled status reports to application team leader
·
Inform
the Project Team if deadlines cannot be kept
·
Propose
recommendations to the Project Team on changes to the College’s policy and
procedure
·
Produce
their product on time
Vice President for Special Projects, Gary Lombard
This
position provides leadership for the entire project implementation
efforts. The main role of the Project
Leader is to provide a global viewpoint, to lead project activities with
executive involvement, to ask the right questions, and to assign the appropriate
resources to an implementation team or administrative unit so that they can
determine how to best implement the software.
Information Technology Project Manager, Sherry Hendrix
The
on-site Project Manager works closely with Datatel employees, the Project
Leader, all the implementation teams and technical staff. Additionally, she will work with the teams
to coordinate project activities, set priorities, schedule tasks, anticipate
and mitigate conflicts, ensure timely progress toward full implementation and
to maintain clear communication among all departments.
The
Application Team Leader is to lead, motivate, organize and facilitate the
functioning of his or her team. Each
team leader will serve as a liaison and member of the Project Team. S/he will seek out expertise as identified
by the team to work toward the goal of the implementing their portion of the Colleague
system.
Responsibilities
include:
·
Helping
team members in identifying and meeting college goals with the use of the new
software
·
Structuring
meetings with agenda
·
Maintaining
minutes of all application meetings
·
Maintaining
the team effort on focus of the meeting objectives
·
Coordinating
interoffice decisions on functional use, code decisions, reporting analysis,
data conversion, policies, and standards within the application area of the
institution
·
Documenting
customization needs as they are identified for future review
·
Enabling
all team members to participate
·
Integrating
disparate points of view
·
Resolving
conflicts that arise
·
Effecting
consensus
·
Defining
the next steps for future meetings in relation to agreed upon goal
This
role leads the implementation decisions made within a single user office. The individual will be the manager or a
designated staff person who can make or coordinate key decisions. Team members will be identified initially by
the particular team with which they are affiliated. As the implementation process unfolds, the implementation team
structure may need to be modified.
Responsibilities
include leading the office through the implementation process, representing and
articulating the office’s needs/expectations from the new system, and
coordinating with Technical Services throughout the implementation process. This person will be the departmental
representative at the training class and will need to understand fully the
applications software, code files, parameters, and data files for their
areas. They will become a strong user of
the query language and will produce many of the reports the office regularly
needs. In addition, they are
responsible for building a departmental procedure manual during the
implementation process. This position reports
to or is the manager of the user area and during the implementation will also
work closely with the Application Team Leader and the liaison representing the
department at the internal user group meeting and serve as the user liaison
between Technical Services and the end-user office.
Each
team is empowered to make decisions that affect only their area of
responsibility. Decisions that affect
more than one team must be made with the involvement of all affected
teams. Any decision that impacts
College policy or would extend the project time line must be reviewed by the
Project Team. It will be expected that
the issues on the agenda will be adequately discussed and all members
encouraged to express their viewpoint.
While it is desirous that a consensus be reached, simple two-thirds of
those present would be considered adequate to carry the vote. In the event that differences arise and
attempts to find a common ground are not reached, the Project Team resolves to
take the matter to Executive Council.
Listed
below by functional areas are the main modules to be undertaken:
Academic Records Degree
Audit
Accounts Receivable Faculty
Information
Campus Organizations Financial
Aid
Cash Receipts Recruitment/Admissions
Communications
Managements Registration
Curriculum Management External Interfaces
Accounts Payable
Budget Management
Fixed Assets
General Ledger
Inventory
Physical Plant
Purchasing
External Interfaces
Personnel
Payroll
Position Management
External Interfaces
In addition, the
Technical Team will provide an array of technical services pertaining to:
Hardware and
software installation
Infrastructure
Security
System Performance
Tools
Database Management
Legacy System
Transition
Data Conversion
Datatel will provide
documents to each team to guide their implementation efforts.
See Addendum C for
schematics showing relationship between different application systems.
Data conversion is a
partnership involving end users, implementation teams, and Information
Technology staff. Files will be
converted from legacy systems and loaded on the Colleague test
system. Users will have an opportunity
to examine, validate and correct the data before it is moved to the live system.
Converting from
current systems to the Colleague
system will involve both a manual and programmatic process. A manual conversion requires that all data
in the selected file be re-entered into the Colleague system. A programmatic conversion requires Information
Technology or Datatel to write a conversion program that converts the data in
the selected file directly to the Colleague system.
Large files, such as
student name and address files typically warrant a programmatic solution. However, large files that have duplicate or
inaccurate data requiring a big “clean-up“ effort are best converted manually
from the beginning as programmatic conversions often do not handle exceptions
very well. Small files are almost
always converted manually. With these files,
it is more time consuming to develop a program to convert them than to re-enter
them manually. The manual or
programmatic conversion decision will be done on a file-by-file basis taking
into consideration several factors including data redundancy and accuracy,
staff time and cost.
Training is key to
ensuring that the new system is used properly and with confidence. The College has contracted with Datatel to
provide training to the Project Team, Application Teams and end-users. For some employees, the training will
include cross-functional instruction.
Training will be
provided in a “team teaching” format by both a functional supervisor and a
Datatel representative. Employees will
receive “hands on” practice on a test system available over the network and
designed to look and perform like the system we will actually use.
Prior to system
implementation, employees will be given the opportunity to test their knowledge
on these practice modules. Additional
training will be provided as necessary.
Some technical
training (system programming and database administration) for the technical
staff will take place at one of Datatel’s facilities.
Testing software to
ensure that it has been configured properly and functions according to our
needs is a critical quality assurance step and will be heavily emphasized
during the later stages of implementation.
The users of the system, not the technical staff, will be responsible
for testing all the scenarios that occur on a frequent or infrequent basis as a
result of their daily work. The
technical staff will be available as a resource to assist users in the
implementation process.
The Project Team may
need to form a “Training Team” to deal with end-user training issues that
arise.
Communication Protocol
|
To ensure effective
project coordination and the diffusion of information, all formal communication
between the Project Team and Application Teams will adhere to the following
protocol:
All formal
communication with Datatel will go through the Datatel Project Manager and the
on-site Project Manager.
The Project Leader
will report regularly to the Executive Council and the Project Manager
Consultant will report to the Board of Regents on a monthly basis.
The Project and
Application Teams will keep their own agendas and minutes in common format,
with the minutes reflecting the decisions made, issues raised or action items
needing to be taken.
Minutes from the
Application Teams are to be sent to the Project Manager on a regular basis.
A Communication Team
may be constituted. Responsibilities
will be to develop a mechanism for informing the College community of project
developments and progress. This will
include usage of existing newsletters and network programs.
The Communication
Team will put on our network or on a web site all materials generated by the
implementation process, the minutes of meetings, newsletters, graphics,
timeliness, representatives list, etc.
A project intranet
site will be established for all employees to reference. The URL for this site is:
|
http://employee.okc.cc.ok.us/vision |
Employees for whom
it is impossible to access the intranet site will be kept informed by their
supervisors.
Each team is
responsible for keeping appropriate documentation of new processes and any
changes to these. When appropriate,
process mapping will be used to identify key positions and steps for each
process. Individuals directly involved
in the processes will be called upon to provide information as the processes
are mapped.
The Project Team
with the leadership of the on-site Project Manager is responsible for
developing and keeping current project implementation time lines. Each Application Team is responsible for
delivering its product on time, and if not able to do so, the Application Team
Leader will inform the on-site Project Manager.
|
Administrative
Guidelines |
The current software
system will not be modified unless one of the following occurs:
Oklahoma City
Community College will maintain the current system with minimal support until
Datatel’s Colleague is fully
implemented. Security will ensure that
employees have access to data elements needed to perform their jobs.
Datatel software
will be installed in its original form throughout the implementation period as
defined in this document. This means
that no changes, including custom programming, will be performed unless it is
an essential business function and approved by the Project Team.
Custom programming
does not include creating calculated fields generated at
reporting time, developing a query report, or developing unique forms for
purchase orders, checks, transcripts, etc.
Each of these tasks is essential to operations and will be performed
during implementation as necessary.
The purpose of these
guidelines is to ensure that both users and the technical staff have enough
knowledge and experience with the Colleague
system to make intelligent changes that do not have adverse effects. Once this knowledge and experience is
obtained, users will no doubt have many suggestions for customizing the system
to achieve news levels of efficiency and student/employee support. As mentioned earlier, Phase IV of the
implementation process will take up customization needs as resources,
schedules, and priorities permit and after all systems are live for one
year. In preparation for this last
phase, implementation teams and work groups are to document customization needs
as they are identified during the implementation process.
The implementation
process at one point or another will affect all employees. The insight and expertise of every employee
is needed in order to make this a successful undertaking.
Our investment of
many years on the path toward quality, and our experience in process
improvement, provide an excellent foundation for this journey.
Application Teams
and
Members
Student Information System
Application Team
|
TEAM: Student Info. System |
|
|
|
LEADER: Gloria Cardenas Barton |
|
|
|
Application Team |
|
|
|
Member |
Title |
Department |
|
Gloria
Cardenas Barton |
Dean of
Admissions/Registrar |
Admissions and Records |
|
Laura Weaver |
Director of
Admissions/Assistant Registrar |
Admissions and Records |
|
Mary Williams |
Dean of Information
Technology |
Division of Information
Technology |
|
Harold Case |
Dean of Student Financial Aid
Services |
Student Financial Aid
Center |
|
Alan Stringfellow |
Coordinator of Information
Technology and Registration Services |
Admissions and Records |
|
Donna Nance |
Director of Finance |
Budget and Management
Services |
|
George Maxwell |
Student Development
Counselor |
Student Development |
Mary Johnson
|
Director of Student
Relations |
Vice President for Student
Services |
|
Pat Barker |
Faculty Association
President |
Division of Social Science |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Human Resources
System
Application Team
|
TEAM: Human Resources |
|
|
|
LEADER: Ruth H. Boone |
|
|
|
Application
Team |
|
|
|
Member |
Title |
Department |
|
|
|
|
|
Ruth
H. Boone |
Director of Human Resources |
Human Resources |
|
Donna Nance |
Director of Finance |
Finance |
|
Francine West |
Payroll Bookkeeper |
Finance |
|
Linda McMurtry |
Assistant Director of
Finance |
Finance |
|
Charlotte Baird |
Accounting/Budget Systems
Coordinator |
Finance |
|
Carolyn Rouillard |
Senior Human Resources
Specialist |
Human Resources |
|
Linda Schulenberg |
Human Resources
Representative |
Human Resources |
|
Kathy Bailey |
Human Resources
Representative |
Human Resources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance System
Application Team
|
TEAM: Finance |
|
|
|
LEADER: Donna S. Nance |
|
|
|
Application
Team |
|
|
|
Member |
Title |
Department |
|
Linda McMurtry |
Assistant
Director of Finance |
Finance |
|
Charlotte
Baird |
Budget
Systems Coordinator |
Finance |
|
Carol
Walck |
Purchasing
Supervisor |
Purchasing |
|
Anna
Webb |
Accounts
Payable Supervisor |
Accounts
Payable |
|
JB
Messer |
Assistant
Director of Physical Plant |
Physical
Plant |
|
Ruth
Boone |
Director
of Human Resources |
Human
Resources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical Team
|
TEAM: Technical |
|
|
|
LEADER: John Richardson |
|
|
|
Technical Team |
|
|
|
Member |
Title |
Department |
|
John
Richardson |
Director of Computer
Systems Development |
Computer Systems
Development |
|
Dorene Campbell |
Lead Computer Operator |
Information Processing
Services |
|
Janice Pearsall |
Programmer/Analyst |
Computer Systems
Development |
|
Kathy Stouder |
Computer Operator |
Information Processing
Services |
|
Ted Lemser |
Database Administrator |
Computer Systems
Development |
|
Connie Drummond |
Programmer/Analyst |
Computer Systems
Development |
|
Gaby Brooks |
Programmer/Analyst |
Computer Systems
Development |
|
Denny Myers |
TCP/IP Applications
Specialist |
Computer Systems
Development |
|
Bill Hodgson |
Computer Operator |
Information Processing
Services |
|
Charlene Wilson |
Data Entry Operator |
Information Processing
Services |
|
Lisa Davis |
Director of Technology
Support Services |
Network Administration and
Microcomputer Technology Support |
|
David Anderson |
Hardware/Software
Specialist |
Information Technology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Module Teams
for
Finance System
Human Resource System
Student Information System
Finance Module Team
|
TEAM: Finance |
|
|
|
LEADER: Linda McMurtry |
|
|
|
MODULE: Purchasing/Accounts Payable/Fixed Assets |
|
|
|
Member |
Title |
Department |
|
|
|
|
|
Carol
Walck |
Purchasing
Supervisor |
Purchasing |
|
Anna
Webb |
Accounts
Payable Supervisor |
Finance |
|
Steve
Duncan |
Material
Control Supervisor |
Physical
Plant |
|
Charlotte
Baird |
Budget
Systems Coordinator |
Finance |
|
Sharen
Hall |
Administrative
Assistant to the Director of Finance |
Finance |
|
Donna
Nance |
Director
of Finance |
Finance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance Module Team
|
TEAM: Finance |
|
|
|
LEADER: Donna S. Nance |
|
|
|
MODULE: Budget |
|
|
|
Member |
Title |
Department |
|
|
|
|
|
Linda
McMurtry |
Assistant
Director of Finance |
Finance |
|
Ruth
Boone |
Director
of Human Resources |
Human
Resources |
|
Charlotte
Baird |
Budget
Systems Coordinator |
Finance |
|
Brandi
Richardson |
Administrative
Assistant to the VP of Business and Finance |
VP
for Business and Finance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance Module Team
|
TEAM: Finance |
|
|
|
LEADER: Charlotte Baird |
|
|
|
MODULE: General Ledger |
|
|
|
Member |
Title |
Department |
|
|
|